![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28) Based on my calculations I needed to spin the S/Cer a bit faster to deliver the flow I required. Going much smaller on the S/Cer pulley meant sacrificing belt wrap and possible belt slipping issues. Instead, I decided to enlarge my stock crank pulley. Shown here is the stock pulley with the alternator ribs machined down to establish a nice flat and round interface for my larger pulley ring. The beginnings of the pulley ring is chucked up and I'm fit checking the tolerance between the two mating parts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29) I tried just about every trick and tool I know to machine the "V" grooves on my lathe. No go, way to much tool chatter, even when trying to cut the grooves like threads. Next I moved to the mill. I tried double sided cutters and other processes but the only one that worked was to make a custom cutter by combining a specially ground tool to a 3/4" shaft and spinning it very fast. I feed the ring into the cutter using the mill table to establish the "V" depth and used the rotary table to cut the groove around the ring. It took about 5 cuts per groove to complete one V groove. At that point I drop the mill knee to establish the next groove centerline and start the process again. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30) Here's the finished product after mating the parts and stitch welding at the interfaces. The surface was given a rough texture by sandblasting to get better belt grip. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31) A view of the pulley installed on the engine. What can't be seen in this view is that there is only enough room between the pulley and oil filter housing to slip the belt over. That's a big as it'll go without modifying the housing. To make 500 hp, I'll need to do just that. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32) I treated the S/Cer pulley to the same surface treatment to achieve better belt grip. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33) The top picture shows the original belt routing. It slipped above 8 psi boost. I re-designed the routing as shown in the second shot. This design produced much better belt wrap and tension could be adjusted at the alternator just like stock. The idler pulley used the alternator pivot bolt for attachment. I used a 12mm bolt turned down at the end to the stock 8mm threads. This produced a very stiff and strong attach point for the pulley. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34) Here's a close up of the belt routing and idler pulley system. Also shown is the front S/Cer support plate which also supports the two idler pulleys. It's fastened to the alternator bracket and block with four bolts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35) Next step was to design a new airbox cover with a new and larger exit location. Shown is my template used to develop the new cover. After the template was completed it's cut into several pieces and used to transfer the cuts and folds onto 6061 sheet stock. The single piece is then bent, folded and welded into the final product. Not shown is the work done on the input side of the airbox. The stock snorkel is removed and replaced with a large dia venturi shaped air horn. I feel those long funnel shaped air intakes on the market simply add another turn the air flow must negotiate and are the wrong shape to begin with as they tend to accelerate the air flow and turn it at the same time. Not good for optimum flow. This idea of "ram air" is simply a marketing ploy. If it worked, F1 cars would have much larger air intakes. In fact, most formula car use very small air intakes relative to the rest of the system. This ensures positive pressure and good flow characteristics to the throttle bodies for even air distribution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36) A big leap in progress from the last shot. The bypass valve tube is welding into place completing the throttle body manifold. The blower to support plate strut is in place. This strut reacts torsional loads and triangulates the entire support assembly for strength and stiffness. The IC filler cap has been welded in place on top the charge cooler. The dual water inlet and outlet hoses have been combined to individual "Y" fittings at the air cleaner box cover. The single hoses route to the front mounted heat exchangers. The fabricated air box cover and connections to throttle body are complete. Connections to the coolant tank are complete. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37) The IC water pressure and return hoses (two each) terminate at their respective "Y"s where single # 12 hoses route forward to the front mounted heat exchangers. I was able to utilize the passenger compartment heater hose for the return line as routing hoses down the center tunnel is a pain. In addition, the heater line is quite large and resulted in lower pressure drop. I re-routed the original heater hose up front to keep the heater functional. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38) A view of my dual IC water-toair heat exchangers. The design sizing and configuration of these exchanges was similar to the IC. In other words, maximum frontal area and min depth. As outside air passes through ANY radiator it warms quickly. As it passes through the core it picks up more heat but at decreasing rate. Since it is the delta difference between the air and core temperature that dictates heat transfer, most of the "work" done by the outside air is done after about 1.5 inches of core depth anyway. Locating the exchanges directly in front of the radiators meant relocating the hood latch mechanism (I used hood pins) and the large harness bundle that crosses over the upper radiator support. I fabricated a special bracket that secured the exchangers and the stock AC reveiver/dryer. The base of both exchanges are secured to the lower radiator support brace using riv-nuts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39) The top shot shows my initial design using a 7 gpm (gals per min) pump. The bottom picture show my current design which uses a 15 gpm pump. Net system flow was 2 gpm and 4 pgm respectively. The extra 2 pgm reduced my max IAT by 20F to 130 degrees after 20 minutes on the track on a 80 degree day . One of the benefits of the water-to-air IC is the ability to incorporate a "holding tank" for the water. The tank serves several purposes. If designed correctly, it prevents water pump cavitation (just like a good oil pan) while the vehicle undergoes various G forces on the track or street. It also allows expansion of the water and separation of possible air in the system. More importantly, due to the large thermal capacity of water, it acts as a thermal buffer during periods of extreme IAT swings. Intake temps significantly BELOW ambient can be achieved by adding iced water to the system. With enough mass (tank volume), IATs could be kept under 100F for an entire 20 minute track session (they would start out low and slowly creep up as the water temp gradually increased). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40) A view of my holding tank and pump as mounted under the hood. One of the downsides of the water cooled IC are increased complexity and more weight. The radiator is a Chevy style Griffin racing model I modified to fit the NSX. Two fans draw air through both radiator and IC heat exchangers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MSC Performance NSX S/C |